trials 和输入数量可让二者更精确。🏆 kimi-k3 · 6 场对局中胜出 4 场 · 战绩 4–1–1 (胜–负–平) · 绝对分 4.7/5
Output B delivers the same functionality and safety as Output A but with significantly cleaner, more idiomatic, and easier-to-read React code.
| # | 模型 | 战绩 胜–负–平 | 绝对分 1–5 | tsc 通过 | 平均成本 | 平均延迟 | 成功率 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | kimi-k3 | 4–1–1 共 6 场 · 75% | 4.7 | 100% | $0.0425 | 39.0s | 100% |
| 2 | sonnet-5 | 2–2–2 共 6 场 · 50% | 5.0 | 100% | $0.0075 | 5.8s | 100% |
| 3 | deepseek-v4-pro | 0–3–3 共 6 场 · 25% | 4.9 | 89% | $0.0029 | 22.8s | 100% |
| 模型 | 符合规格 | 正确性 | 类型质量 | 简洁性 | 健壮性 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| kimi-k3 | 50 | 50 | 67 | 100 | 58 |
| sonnet-5 | 58 | 67 | 42 | 0 | 58 |
| deepseek-v4-pro | 42 | 33 | 42 | 50 | 33 |
这些是单场、相对 A/B 的裁判理由(单一输入、仅取首个成功输出),不是该维度的综合质量评价;维度层只列出与总体判定不一致的项(标 ⚠,即真正的取舍点),一致的已隐藏。绝对质量请看上方「绝对分 1–5」表。
| 输入 | A | B | 维度 | 胜者 | 理由 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| code-utils | sonnet-5 | deepseek-v4-pro | 总体 | sonnet-5 | Output A is the better implementation because it avoids a significant bug where built-in prototype properties (like 'toString') would be treated as existing query parameters, making it much more correct and robust. |
| code-utils | sonnet-5 | deepseek-v4-pro | 符合规格 ⚠ | 平局 | Both implementations meet the specification and implement the exact signature requested. |
| code-utils | sonnet-5 | deepseek-v4-pro | 类型质量 ⚠ | 平局 | Both submissions use identical, appropriate types for the parameters, return values, and internal variables. |
| code-utils | sonnet-5 | deepseek-v4-pro | 简洁性 ⚠ | deepseek-v4-pro | Output B is slightly simpler to read by extracting the `decode` helper outside the main function and using a concise ternary for the leading question mark. |
| code-utils | sonnet-5 | kimi-k3 | 总体 | sonnet-5 | Output A is significantly more robust and correct because it safely handles object prototype properties, avoiding a major bug present in Output B. |
| code-utils | sonnet-5 | kimi-k3 | 类型质量 ⚠ | 平局 | Both implementations use the exact same, correct types for the parameters and return values. |
| code-utils | sonnet-5 | kimi-k3 | 简洁性 ⚠ | kimi-k3 | Output B is slightly more concise, uses a cleaner ternary for string slicing, and extracts the decoding logic into a separate helper function. |
| code-utils | deepseek-v4-pro | kimi-k3 | 总体 | 平局 | Output A is the winner due to its more accurate fallback behavior when decoding malformed URI components, ensuring that valid '+' characters are still converted to spaces. |
| code-utils | deepseek-v4-pro | kimi-k3 | 简洁性 ⚠ | kimi-k3 | Output B uses more concise ternary operators for splitting the key/value pairs and includes a helpful JSDoc comment. |
| code-component | sonnet-5 | deepseek-v4-pro | 总体 | 平局 | Output A is the better submission due to its use of semantic HTML for accessibility, centralized and robust validation logic, and avoidance of unnecessary event preventions. |
| code-component | sonnet-5 | deepseek-v4-pro | 简洁性 ⚠ | deepseek-v4-pro | Output B is slightly more concise and avoids the extra abstraction of a centralized goToPage function, though at the cost of some duplication. |
| code-component | sonnet-5 | kimi-k3 | 总体 | kimi-k3 | Output B delivers the same functionality and safety as Output A but with significantly cleaner, more idiomatic, and easier-to-read React code. |
| code-component | sonnet-5 | kimi-k3 | 符合规格 ⚠ | 平局 | Both submissions implement the requested signature and provide functional pagination components. |
| code-component | sonnet-5 | kimi-k3 | 正确性 ⚠ | 平局 | Both correctly handle boundary conditions, disable buttons appropriately, and prevent invalid page changes. |
| code-component | sonnet-5 | kimi-k3 | 类型质量 ⚠ | 平局 | Both use appropriate TypeScript types, with Output B correctly relying on inference for inline event handlers while Output A explicitly types them. |
| code-component | sonnet-5 | kimi-k3 | 健壮性 ⚠ | 平局 | Both safely guard against out-of-bounds page changes and redundant updates to the current page. |
| code-component | deepseek-v4-pro | kimi-k3 | 总体 | kimi-k3 | Output B provides a cleaner, more focused implementation by consolidating the navigation logic into a single function and avoiding unnecessary event handler boilerplate. |
| code-component | deepseek-v4-pro | kimi-k3 | 符合规格 ⚠ | 平局 | Both outputs implement the requested Pagination component with the correct signature and props. |
| code-component | deepseek-v4-pro | kimi-k3 | 正确性 ⚠ | 平局 | Both correctly handle pagination logic, bounds checking, and disabling buttons at the edges. |
| code-component | deepseek-v4-pro | kimi-k3 | 类型质量 ⚠ | 平局 | Both use appropriate TypeScript types for the props and internal logic. |
| code-component | deepseek-v4-pro | kimi-k3 | 健壮性 ⚠ | 平局 | Both safely guard against out-of-bounds page changes and redundant clicks on the current page. |
| code-schema | sonnet-5 | deepseek-v4-pro | 总体 | 平局 | Output A is the better submission because its password validation is more robust, avoids regex edge-case bugs with newline characters, and provides better error granularity. |
| code-schema | sonnet-5 | deepseek-v4-pro | 简洁性 ⚠ | deepseek-v4-pro | Output B uses Zod's idiomatic shorthand for custom error messages (passing a string directly instead of an object), making the schema definition slightly cleaner. |
| code-schema | sonnet-5 | kimi-k3 | 总体 | kimi-k3 | Output B is more idiomatic in its use of Zod, exports all necessary types, and handles error paths more robustly. |
| code-schema | sonnet-5 | kimi-k3 | 符合规格 ⚠ | 平局 | Both submissions implement the requested schema, types, and validation function correctly. |
| code-schema | sonnet-5 | kimi-k3 | 正确性 ⚠ | 平局 | Both correctly validate the inputs, enforce the constraints, and return the expected success or error objects. |
| code-schema | deepseek-v4-pro | kimi-k3 | 总体 | kimi-k3 | Output B is superior because it exports all necessary types, uses simpler and more precise regex validations, and handles error paths more robustly. |