/**
 * EU Legal Professional Privilege Compliance Pack
 *
 * Governs the protection of lawyer-client communications under EU law
 * as established by ECJ jurisprudence and reflected in member-state law.
 *
 * Primary authority:
 *   - ECJ Case C-550/07 P, Akzo Nobel Chemicals v Commission (2010):
 *     the definitive EU LPP standard. LPP applies ONLY to communications
 *     with external lawyers who are members of an EU/EEA Bar and are
 *     independent (not employed by the client). In-house counsel
 *     communications are NOT privileged under EU law.
 *   - ECJ Case C-283/05, ASML Netherlands (2006): limits scope of
 *     LPP in cross-border proceedings.
 *   - ECJ Case 155/79, AM&S Europe v Commission (1982): original
 *     establishment of EU LPP doctrine; two conditions -- (1) made for
 *     the purpose of the client's right of defence; (2) from independent
 *     lawyers enrolled in an EU/EEA Bar.
 *   - Member-state law varies in scope: France (secret professionnel),
 *     Germany (Berufsgeheimnis), Netherlands (verschoningsrecht), etc.
 *     The EU standard provides a floor; member-state law may be broader.
 *
 * Critical distinctions from US ABA privilege:
 *   - In-house EU counsel are NOT privileged under Akzo Nobel -- only
 *     external lawyers with EU/EEA Bar membership.
 *   - Only communications made "for the purpose of the client's right
 *     of defence" in the context of EU competition / regulatory
 *     proceedings meet the Akzo Nobel test at EU level.
 *   - Third-country counsel (US, UK post-Brexit, etc.) -- privilege
 *     analysis depends on the proceedings and forum; UK solicitors
 *     are now third-country post-Brexit for EU purposes.
 *   - UK post-Brexit note: UK solicitors/barristers are no longer
 *     EU/EEA Bar members. Communications with UK counsel for EU
 *     Commission proceedings do NOT attract EU LPP. UK GDPR
 *     domestically preserves UK LPP, but EU Commission cannot be
 *     required to recognise it.
 *
 * Applicable context:
 *   - EU Commission competition / state aid investigations
 *   - EU Merger Regulation (EC 139/2004) Phase I/II proceedings
 *   - EU antitrust (Art. 101/102 TFEU) investigations
 *   - Any EU regulatory proceeding with access to legal files
 *   - AI systems processing legal documents at EU-regulated firms
 *
 * @connexum/ai-governance
 */
import { CompliancePack } from './index';
import { CategoryClassifiers } from '../classification/pack-driven-classifier';
/**
 * EU Legal Professional Privilege category classifiers.
 * Critically: in-house counsel communications are NOT privileged.
 * The classifier flags communications that appear privileged but
 * must separately evaluate whether the lawyer is external and
 * EU/EEA Bar-enrolled.
 */
export declare const EU_LPP_CATEGORY_CLASSIFIERS: CategoryClassifiers;
export declare const EU_LPP_PACK: CompliancePack & {
    categoryClassifiers: CategoryClassifiers;
    subjectKeyedCategories: string[];
};
//# sourceMappingURL=eu-lpp.d.ts.map