/**
 * AU AI Ethics Framework + Voluntary AI Safety Standard (2024)
 *
 * X1-DISAGGREGATION REVIEW (2026-04-24): ACCEPTABLE AS ONE PACK.
 *   Both instruments are voluntary, both issued by DISR (Department of
 *   Industry, Science and Resources), both covering the same domain (AU
 *   voluntary AI governance). The 2024 Voluntary AI Safety Standard is
 *   the operative evolution of the 2019 AI Ethics Framework -- DISR
 *   explicitly framed the 2024 Standard as the current operative guidance
 *   while the 2019 Framework remains the foundational document. They are
 *   complementary, not competing, and are consistently cited together by
 *   ASIC, APRA, and OAIC as a unified voluntary governance signal. Single
 *   issuing authority (DISR). Single voluntary compliance standard. No
 *   split required.
 *
 * Primary instruments:
 *   - Australia's AI Ethics Framework (DISR, 2019): 8 core AI Ethics Principles
 *     (voluntary for private sector, expected for government).
 *   - Voluntary AI Safety Standard (DISR, September 2024): 10 voluntary guardrails
 *     aligned with proposed mandatory guardrails.
 *
 * Status as at April 2026: Both voluntary. Voluntary AI Safety Standard (Sep 2024)
 * is current operative guidance pending mandatory legislation. Voluntary Standard
 * cited by ASIC, APRA, and OAIC as relevant standard for reasonable conduct.
 *
 * 8 AI Ethics Principles (2019):
 *   Wellbeing; Human-centred values; Fairness; Privacy and security;
 *   Reliability and safety; Transparency and explainability; Contestability;
 *   Accountability.
 *
 * 10 Voluntary Guardrails (Sep 2024):
 *   G1 Accountability; G2 Governance Framework; G3 Stakeholder Engagement;
 *   G4 Human Oversight; G5 Testing; G6 Documentation/Provenance;
 *   G7 Inform of AI Use; G8 Review/Redress/Appeal; G9 Privacy Protection;
 *   G10 Security.
 *
 * Most pack categories produce WARN actions (voluntary framework). Exception:
 * AU_AI_UNDISCLOSED_USE is BLOCK — G7 non-deception principle treats undisclosed
 * AI use in decisions affecting individuals as a deception, warranting hard refusal.
 * Enforcement risk arises where entity holds itself out as compliant but is not,
 * or where regulators use non-adherence as evidence of inadequate risk management
 * under sector-specific laws.
 *
 * Cross-pack interactions:
 *   - au-aiethics-framework + au-mandatory-ai-guardrails: Voluntary is legislative-
 *     evolution precursor. Run both; voluntary covers current operative standard;
 *     mandatory covers anticipated requirements. When legislation enacted, mandatory
 *     pack becomes primary.
 *   - au-aiethics-framework + nist-ai-rmf: NIST RMF 4 functions (Govern/Map/
 *     Measure/Manage) substantially align with Voluntary Standard's 10 guardrails.
 *     Cross-jurisdictional AU-US AI governance coverage.
 *   - au-aiethics-framework + iso42001: ISO/IEC 42001 closely maps to Voluntary
 *     Standard. ISO 42001 certification gives substantial Voluntary Standard
 *     compliance. Run alongside iso42001 for AU-specific context.
 *
 * Authority: Department of Industry, Science and Resources (DISR)
 * Sovereignty: Australian Federal (voluntary)
 *
 * @connexum/ai-governance
 */
import { CompliancePack } from './index';
import { CategoryClassifiers } from '../classification/pack-driven-classifier';
export declare const AU_AIETHICS_CATEGORY_CLASSIFIERS: CategoryClassifiers;
export declare const AU_AIETHICS_PACK: CompliancePack & {
    categoryClassifiers: CategoryClassifiers;
    subjectKeyedCategories: string[];
};
//# sourceMappingURL=au-aiethics-framework.d.ts.map