/**
 * LPO 2024 AI Disclosure Pack
 *
 * PLACEHOLDER STATUS. Pack is not yet authoritative. 3 jurisdictions bundled;
 * per-jurisdiction obligations require Vera + counsel sign-off before status
 * promotion to ACTIVE.
 *
 * OPERATOR_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED: Before activating this pack in any
 * production deployment, confirm with Vera (Legal, CXNI-008) and qualified
 * counsel that the correct jurisdiction's rules apply:
 *   1. HK Law Society Practice Direction P (2024): Applies to solicitors
 *      practising in Hong Kong. Obligations: AI disclosure to clients, data
 *      confidentiality gates, practitioner supervision, citation verification.
 *      Verify: Practice Direction P, ss. 3-7.
 *   2. SRA Code of Conduct (UK): Applies to solicitors and firms regulated
 *      by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Obligations: competence (Rule
 *      3.3), client disclosure, confidentiality (Rule 6.3). Verify: SRA 2024
 *      AI Guidance + Statement of Principle on AI and Technology Competence.
 *   3. Law Society of England & Wales AI Resource Hub (2024): Best-practice
 *      obligations for E&W solicitors. Verify: Technology and the Law Report
 *      2024 obligations checklist before citing as binding.
 *
 * F-NEW-VERA-PACK-FINAL-004 (2026-05-03): TODO replaced with structured
 * OPERATOR_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED notice per Vera closeout probe.
 *
 * This pack draws from multiple current sources:
 *   (a) The Legal Practitioners Ordinance (Cap. 159, Hong Kong) as
 *       supplemented by the Law Society of Hong Kong Practice Direction
 *       P on Use of Generative AI (issued 2024).
 *   (b) The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA, UK) Statement of
 *       Principle on AI and Technology Competence (2024).
 *   (c) The Law Society of England & Wales Technology and the Law
 *       Report 2024: Obligations for AI-Assisted Legal Work.
 *
 * This pack COMPLEMENTS aba.ts (US MRPC framework). Activate both for
 * firms with US + HK/UK practices.
 *
 * Core AI-disclosure obligations synthesised:
 *   1. Competence: Practitioners must understand material limitations of
 *      AI tools used in client work (equivalent to MRPC 1.1 covered in
 *      aba.ts -- HK/UK analogue).
 *   2. Disclosure to client: Client must be informed if AI is used in
 *      a material way in their matter.
 *   3. Confidentiality: Client data must not be input into AI tools
 *      without appropriate data processing agreements.
 *   4. Supervision: AI output must be reviewed by a qualified
 *      practitioner before use in client work.
 *   5. Accuracy: AI-generated citations, statutes, and case references
 *      must be independently verified.
 *   6. Billing: AI processing time may not be billed at standard rate
 *      without disclosure.
 *
 * This pack COMPLEMENTS aba.ts (US MRPC framework). Activate both for
 * firms with US + HK/UK practices.
 *
 * @connexum/ai-governance
 */
import { CompliancePack } from './index';
import { CategoryClassifiers } from '../classification/pack-driven-classifier';
/**
 * LPO 2024 (Hong Kong Law Society AI Practice Direction) category classifiers.
 * Governs AI use in Hong Kong legal practice. Mirrors ABA privilege/work-product
 * obligations with HKLS-specific requirements (Practice Direction P 2024).
 */
export declare const LPO2024_CATEGORY_CLASSIFIERS: CategoryClassifiers;
export declare const LPO2024_PACK: CompliancePack & {
    categoryClassifiers: CategoryClassifiers;
    subjectKeyedCategories: string[];
};
//# sourceMappingURL=lpo2024.d.ts.map