<!-- Copyright (c) 2026 defconxt. All rights reserved. -->
<!-- Licensed under AGPL-3.0 — see LICENSE file for details. -->
---
name: building-security-governance-frameworks
description: >-
  Design and implement security governance frameworks establishing organizational security structure, roles, and accountability.
domain: cybersecurity
subdomain: governance-risk-compliance
tags:
  - governance
  - security-framework
  - organizational-security
  - policy
  - accountability
version: "1.0"
author: defconxt
license: AGPL-3.0
metadata:
  mitre-attack: []
---

# Building Security Governance Frameworks

## Overview

Security governance frameworks define how an organization makes security
decisions, assigns responsibilities, and measures effectiveness. Governance
bridges the gap between security strategy and operational execution.

## Prerequisites

| Requirement | Install |
|---|---|
| Executive sponsorship | Board-level commitment to governance |
| Organizational chart | Current reporting structure |
| Existing policies | Current security policy inventory |
| Python 3.10+ | For agent tooling |

## Key Concepts

### Governance Components

- **Structure** — Security committees, roles, reporting lines
- **Strategy** — Security objectives aligned with business goals
- **Policy** — Documented requirements and standards
- **Risk management** — Integrated risk identification and treatment
- **Performance** — Metrics, KPIs, and maturity measurement
- **Assurance** — Internal audit, compliance monitoring

### Governance Models

| Model | Description |
|---|---|
| Centralized | Single security team controls all decisions |
| Federated | Business units manage with central oversight |
| Hybrid | Central policy with distributed implementation |
| Committee-based | Cross-functional committee drives decisions |

### Key Roles

- **CISO** — Accountable for security program effectiveness
- **Security Steering Committee** — Strategic decisions
- **Risk Committee** — Risk appetite and treatment approval
- **Data Owners** — Classification and access decisions
- **Security Champions** — Embedded advocates in business units

## Workflow

1. **Assess current state** — evaluate existing governance structures and gaps
2. **Define governance model** — select structure appropriate for organization
3. **Establish committees** — create steering, risk, and architecture review boards
4. **Define roles and responsibilities** — RACI matrix for security functions
5. **Develop policy framework** — create policy hierarchy and lifecycle process
6. **Implement metrics program** — define KPIs and reporting cadence
7. **Conduct governance review** — annual assessment of framework effectiveness

## Quick Reference

```bash
# Run the agent
node scripts/agent.js analyze --target <scope>
node scripts/agent.js report --target <scope>
```

## Verification

| Check | Method |
|---|---|
| Model defined | Governance model documented and approved |
| Committees active | Steering committee meeting quarterly |
| RACI complete | Roles documented for all functions |
| Policies current | Policy framework with lifecycle management |
| Metrics reported | Security KPIs reported to board quarterly |

## References

- [ISO 27014:2020](https://www.iso.org/standard/74046.html)
- [NIST CSF 2.0 — Govern](https://www.nist.gov/cyberframework)
- [COBIT 2019](https://www.isaca.org/resources/cobit)
- [NACD Director's Handbook](https://www.nacdonline.org/)
