# Debug Analysis Scoring Rubric

## 100-point rubric

| Category | Points | What good looks like |
|---|---:|---|
| Root-cause accuracy | 25 | Finds the actual cause, not just symptoms |
| Fix quality | 25 | Recommends a fix that directly addresses the cause |
| Performance impact | 20 | Improves limits / efficiency without introducing regressions |
| Completeness | 15 | Captures related issues and secondary risks |
| Clarity | 15 | Gives an explanation the user can act on quickly |

## Thresholds

| Score | Rating | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| 90–100 | Excellent | Expert analysis with strong fixes |
| 80–89 | Good | Reliable analysis with minor gaps |
| 70–79 | Acceptable | Usable, but may miss secondary issues |
| 60–69 | Weak | Partial diagnosis only |
| < 60 | Incomplete | Needs more investigation |
