Return-Path: anthony@interlink.com.au
Delivery-Date: Sat Sep  7 04:44:50 2002
From: anthony@interlink.com.au (Anthony Baxter)
Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2002 13:44:50 +1000
Subject: [Spambayes] understanding high false negative rate 
In-Reply-To: 
	<200209062026.g86KQqJ03393@pcp02138704pcs.reston01.va.comcast.net> 
Message-ID: <200209070344.g873io020676@localhost.localdomain>


> Looks like your ham corpus by and large has To: jeremy@alum.mit.edu in
> a header while your spam corpus by and large doesn't.  But this one
> does.

Interestingly, for me, one of the highest value spam indicators was
the name of the mail host that the spam was delivered to, in the To:
line. So mail to info@gin.elax2.ekorp.com was pretty much a dead cert
for the filters.


-- 
Anthony Baxter     <anthony@interlink.com.au>   
It's never too late to have a happy childhood.

