From ilug-admin@linux.ie  Mon Aug 12 11:06:49 2002
Return-Path: <ilug-admin@linux.ie>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E2E04415A
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon, 12 Aug 2002 05:56:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 12 Aug 2002 10:56:02 +0100 (IST)
Received: from lugh.tuatha.org (root@lugh.tuatha.org [194.125.145.45]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7BALWb30227 for
    <jm-ilug@jmason.org>; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 11:21:32 +0100
Received: from lugh (root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lugh.tuatha.org
    (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA18407; Sun, 11 Aug 2002 11:18:31 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: lugh.tuatha.org: Host root@localhost [127.0.0.1]
    claimed to be lugh
Received: from mail02.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net
    (mail02.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net [159.134.118.18]) by lugh.tuatha.org
    (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA18371 for <ilug@linux.ie>; Sun,
    11 Aug 2002 11:18:19 +0100
Message-Id: <200208111018.LAA18371@lugh.tuatha.org>
Received: (qmail 11532 messnum 33762 invoked from
    network[159.134.237.75/jimbo.eircom.net]); 11 Aug 2002 10:17:47 -0000
Received: from jimbo.eircom.net (HELO webmail.eircom.net) (159.134.237.75)
    by mail02.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (qp 11532) with SMTP; 11 Aug 2002
    10:17:47 -0000
From: "wintermute" <cout@eircom.net>
To: ilug@linux.ie
Subject: Re: [ILUG] Alan Cox doesn't like 2.5 so far!
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 11:17:47 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-Ip: 213.202.165.44
X-Mailer: Eircom Net CRC Webmail (http://www.eircom.net/)
Organization: Eircom Net (http://www.eircom.net/)
Sender: ilug-admin@linux.ie
Errors-To: ilug-admin@linux.ie
X-Mailman-Version: 1.1
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Irish Linux Users' Group <ilug.linux.ie>
X-Beenthere: ilug@linux.ie

> The impression I get from reading lkml the odd time is
> that IDE has gone downhill since Andre Hedrick was 
> effectively removed as maintainer. Martin Dalecki seems
> to have been unable to further development without 
> much breakage. 

Hmm... begs the question, why remove Handrick?
If it ain't broke, don't fix it.


-- 
Irish Linux Users' Group: ilug@linux.ie
http://www.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug for (un)subscription information.
List maintainer: listmaster@linux.ie


