From fork-admin@xent.com  Mon Sep  2 23:01:30 2002
Return-Path: <fork-admin@xent.com>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.spamassassin.taint.org
Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C86A516F23
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon,  2 Sep 2002 23:01:07 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 02 Sep 2002 23:01:07 +0100 (IST)
Received: from xent.com ([64.161.22.236]) by dogma.slashnull.org
    (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g82GXqZ09955 for <jm@jmason.org>;
    Mon, 2 Sep 2002 17:33:53 +0100
Received: from lair.xent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by xent.com (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 751382940A6; Mon,  2 Sep 2002 09:31:02 -0700 (PDT)
Delivered-To: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
Received: from mojo-jojo.ebuilt.net (mojo-jojo.ebuilt.net [209.216.43.10])
    by xent.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B7F2294099 for <fork@xent.com>;
    Mon,  2 Sep 2002 09:30:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 23019 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2002 16:32:40 -0000
Received: from nat.ebuilt.com (HELO thedudebvi1wob) (209.216.46.200) by
    mojo-jojo.ebuilt.net with SMTP; 2 Sep 2002 16:32:40 -0000
Reply-To: <rbfar@ebuilt.com>
From: "Reza B'Far (eBuilt)" <rbfar@ebuilt.com>
To: "Adam L. Beberg" <beberg@mithral.com>,
	"Mr. FoRK" <fork_list@hotmail.com>
Cc: <fork@spamassassin.taint.org>
Subject: RE: Java is for kiddies
Message-Id: <NCBBJMBPOKEEKDAILFNGOEBKFEAA.rbfar@ebuilt.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-Msmail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0209012058020.3683-100000@watcher.mithral.com>
Sender: fork-admin@xent.com
Errors-To: fork-admin@xent.com
X-Beenthere: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:fork@spamassassin.taint.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>, <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Friends of Rohit Khare <fork.xent.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork>,
    <mailto:fork-request@xent.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://xent.com/pipermail/fork/>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 09:30:22 -0700

With the increasing prevalence of web services (not that they are always a
good thing), I doubt that parsing XML will be something that will remain at
the Java application layer for long... Recent threads here on Fork
indicating the move towards hardware parsing or this code even become part
of the native implementation of Java on various platforms...

Reza B'Far

-----Original Message-----
From: fork-admin@xent.com [mailto:fork-admin@xent.com]On Behalf Of Adam
L. Beberg
Sent: Sunday, September 01, 2002 9:01 PM
To: Mr. FoRK
Cc: fork@spamassassin.taint.org
Subject: Re: Java is for kiddies


On Sun, 1 Sep 2002, Mr. FoRK wrote:

> > 6.  Hardware is getting so fast that I'm not sure if the performance
> > difference between Java and C/C++ are relevant any more.
>
> When out-of-the-box parsing & transform of XML in java is 25x slower than
> C++ on the same hardware then it does matter.

Yea, and that on top of the 100x of all the parsing engines over just
bigendian'ing it and passing the data (5x+++) in the raw. Then it REALLY
matters.

- Adam L. "Duncan" Beberg
  http://www.mithral.com/~beberg/
  beberg@mithral.com


