From spamassassin-talk-admin@lists.sourceforge.net  Sat Sep 14 20:05:30 2002
Return-Path: <spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.spamassassin.taint.org
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14F9016F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 20:05:30 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Sat, 14 Sep 2002 20:05:30 +0100 (IST)
Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
    [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
    g8EGN4C09608 for <jm-sa@jmason.org>; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 17:23:04 +0100
Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
    helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
    esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17qFgK-0002eo-00; Sat,
    14 Sep 2002 09:22:04 -0700
Received: from eclectic.kluge.net ([66.92.69.221]) by
    usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
    (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17qFew-0004CK-00 for
    <Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 09:20:38 -0700
Received: from eclectic.kluge.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
    eclectic.kluge.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id g8EGJG4q021248;
    Sat, 14 Sep 2002 12:19:16 -0400
Received: (from felicity@localhost) by eclectic.kluge.net
    (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id g8EGJEWB021246; Sat, 14 Sep 2002 12:19:14 -0400
From: Theo Van Dinter <felicity@kluge.net>
To: Justin Mason <yyyy@spamassassin.taint.org>
Cc: Gerry Doris <gerry@dorfam.ca>,
	Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Still confused about spamd/c
Message-Id: <20020914161913.GA20696@kluge.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209131959410.30938-100000@tiger.dorfam.ca>
    <20020914152752.AE39B16F03@jmason.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
    protocol="application/pgp-signature";
    boundary="Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20020914152752.AE39B16F03@spamassassin.taint.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-GPG-Keyserver: http://wwwkeys.pgp.net
X-GPG-Keynumber: 0xE580B363
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 75B1 F6D0 8368 38E7 A4C5  F6C2 02E3 9051 E580 B363
Sender: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net
X-Beenthere: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@example.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net>
List-Subscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
    <mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Talk about SpamAssassin <spamassassin-talk.example.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
    <mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=spamassassin-talk>
X-Original-Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 12:19:14 -0400
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2002 12:19:14 -0400


--Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Sep 14, 2002 at 04:27:47PM +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
> It's probably that razor needs to be "razor-register"'d for each user.
> Try creating a world-writable "home dir" for Razor and DCC et al to store
> their files in; that way spamd will share the razor server info etc.
> between all users.

uh, no, you don't want to make it world-writable.  world-readable.

> Then use "spamd -H /path/to/world/writeable/dir" .

Just remember that the .razor and whatever DCC uses needs to be
world-readable as well.  The solution is then to make a world-writable
log file for at least Razor.  I like symlinking /dev/null myself.

> IMO this is more efficient than using "spamd -H", which will use each
> user's own home dir for this data, but it's a matter of opinion ;)

efficient?  probably (depends on the user base), but it also takes
the control away from the user (which may or may not be a good thing,
depending again on the user base...)

--=20
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"What's funny?  I'd like to know.  Send me some E-Mail." - Prof. Farr

--Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9g2GBAuOQUeWAs2MRAlljAKC+83f/mNoINBjoxOWBaNk4NgWsVQCg3qzO
v0EQ6XGB3ufLLudAUAADtYA=
=l7M5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q--


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk


