From 0xdeadbeef-request@petting-zoo.net  Wed Oct  9 10:49:11 2002
Return-Path: <0xdeadbeef-request@petting-zoo.net>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.spamassassin.taint.org
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E3116F21
	for <jm@localhost>; Wed,  9 Oct 2002 10:47:44 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Wed, 09 Oct 2002 10:47:44 +0100 (IST)
Received: from petting-zoo.net (petting-zoo.net [64.166.12.219]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g98JRnK30860 for
    <jm-deadbeef@jmason.org>; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 20:27:49 +0100
Received: by petting-zoo.net (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 65388EA0A;
    Tue,  8 Oct 2002 12:28:08 -0700 (PDT)
Old-Return-Path: <gkm@petting-zoo.net>
Delivered-To: 0xdeadbeef@petting-zoo.net
Received: from petting-zoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by petting-zoo.net
    (Postfix) with ESMTP id 186BCEA0A for <0xdeadbeef@petting-zoo.net>;
    Tue,  8 Oct 2002 12:28:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: gkm@petting-zoo.net (glen mccready)
To: 0xdeadbeef@petting-zoo.net
Subject: Upgrade
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 12:28:05 -0700
Sender: gkm@petting-zoo.net
Message-Id: <20021008192806.186BCEA0A@petting-zoo.net>
Resent-Message-Id: <iaDGh.A.Z5D.HHzo9@petting-zoo.net>
Resent-From: 0xdeadbeef@petting-zoo.net
X-Mailing-List: <0xdeadbeef@petting-zoo.net> archive/latest/546
X-Loop: 0xdeadbeef@petting-zoo.net
List-Post: <mailto:0xdeadbeef@petting-zoo.net>
List-Help: <mailto:0xdeadbeef-request@petting-zoo.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:0xdeadbeef-request@petting-zoo.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:0xdeadbeef-request@petting-zoo.net?subject=unsubscribe>
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: 0xdeadbeef-request@petting-zoo.net
Resent-Date: Tue,  8 Oct 2002 12:28:08 -0700 (PDT)


Forwarded-by: Nev Dull <nev@sleepycat.com>
Forwarded-by: Gene Spafford <spaf@cerias.purdue.edu>
Forwarded-by: Sean Ennis <ennis@avant.ca>
Forwarded-by: dpbsmith@bellatlantic.net (Daniel P. B. Smith)

"I've started referring to the proposed action against Iraq as Desert
Storm 1.1, since it reminds me of a Microsoft upgrade: it's expensive,
most people aren't sure they want it, and it probably won't work."
		-- Kevin G. Barkes


