From spamassassin-talk-admin@lists.sourceforge.net  Thu Sep  5 12:51:27 2002
Return-Path: <spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.spamassassin.taint.org
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4B616F1F
	for <jm@localhost>; Thu,  5 Sep 2002 12:51:22 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Thu, 05 Sep 2002 12:51:22 +0100 (IST)
Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
    [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
    g85BdXZ17230 for <jm-sa@jmason.org>; Thu, 5 Sep 2002 12:39:33 +0100
Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
    helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
    esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17muyU-0002qr-00; Thu,
    05 Sep 2002 04:39:02 -0700
Received: from relay07.indigo.ie ([194.125.133.231]) by
    usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with smtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id
    17muxW-0001OX-00 for <SpamAssassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>;
    Thu, 05 Sep 2002 04:38:02 -0700
Received: (qmail 17070 messnum 1023657 invoked from
    network[194.125.172.167/ts12-167.dublin.indigo.ie]); 5 Sep 2002 11:37:57
    -0000
Received: from ts12-167.dublin.indigo.ie (HELO spamassassin.taint.org)
    (194.125.172.167) by relay07.indigo.ie (qp 17070) with SMTP;
    5 Sep 2002 11:37:57 -0000
Received: by spamassassin.taint.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 76D1C16F20;
    Thu,  5 Sep 2002 12:15:40 +0100 (IST)
Received: from spamassassin.taint.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamassassin.taint.org (Postfix)
    with ESMTP id 73FAAF7B1 for <SpamAssassin-talk@lists.sf.net>;
    Thu,  5 Sep 2002 12:15:40 +0100 (IST)
To: SpamAssassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net
From: yyyy@spamassassin.taint.org (Justin Mason)
X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: 0A48 2D8B 0B52 A87D 0E8A  6ADD 4137 1B50 6E58 EF0A
X-Image-Url: http://spamassassin.taint.org/me.jpg
X-Habeas-Swe-1: winter into spring
X-Habeas-Swe-2: brightly anticipated
X-Habeas-Swe-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)
X-Habeas-Swe-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)
X-Habeas-Swe-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this
X-Habeas-Swe-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas
X-Habeas-Swe-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant
X-Habeas-Swe-8: Message (HCM) and not spam.  Please report use of this
X-Habeas-Swe-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report/>.
Message-Id: <20020905111540.76D1C16F20@spamassassin.taint.org>
Subject: [SAtalk] Thought for RPM/deb/etc packagers
Sender: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net
X-Beenthere: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@example.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net>
List-Subscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
    <mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Talk about SpamAssassin <spamassassin-talk.example.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
    <mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=spamassassin-talk>
X-Original-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2002 12:15:35 +0100
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2002 12:15:35 +0100

BTW, I've been thinking a little about the RPMs and other packages.
Already the PLD guys are distributing 3 rpms:

  - perl-Mail-SpamAssassin

          the perl modules.

  - spamassassin

          the "spamassassin" and "spamd" scripts,
          spamd rc-file etc.

  - spamassassin-tools

          mass-check, masses directory stuff, etc.
          for generating rescore data from corpora.

This seems like a good way to do it; this way, stuff which just needs
the perl modules doesn't need to require the full RPM be installed,
with RC files in init.d etc.

It's been adopted in the distributed .spec file, anyway.

Theo, BTW, what's the eval test you add in the tvd version of the RPM?

--j.


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

