From spamassassin-talk-admin@lists.sourceforge.net  Fri Sep 13 20:45:39 2002
Return-Path: <spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.spamassassin.taint.org
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D4E16F03
	for <jm@localhost>; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 20:45:37 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Fri, 13 Sep 2002 20:45:37 +0100 (IST)
Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
    [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
    g8DJZZC32227 for <jm-sa@jmason.org>; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 20:35:35 +0100
Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
    helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
    esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17pw9f-0005dL-00; Fri,
    13 Sep 2002 12:31:03 -0700
Received: from nat-pool-rdu.spamassassin.taint.org ([66.187.233.200]
    helo=lacrosse.corp.redhat.com) by usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp
    (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17pw8x-000458-00 for
    <spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 12:30:19 -0700
Received: from [10.0.0.221] (vpn50-6.rdu.spamassassin.taint.org [172.16.50.6]) by
    lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g8DJU6826890;
    Fri, 13 Sep 2002 15:30:06 -0400
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] OT: DNS MX Record Clarification Please
From: Jason Kohles <jkohles@spamassassin.taint.org>
To: vernon@comp-wiz.com
Cc: spamassassin-talk <spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net>
In-Reply-To: <20020913183343.M49078@b2unow.com>
References: <20020913151635.M21128@b2unow.com>
    <20020913183343.M49078@b2unow.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6)
Message-Id: <1031945265.2215.2.camel@traveller>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net
X-Beenthere: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@example.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net>
List-Subscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
    <mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Talk about SpamAssassin <spamassassin-talk.example.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
    <mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=spamassassin-talk>
X-Original-Date: 13 Sep 2002 15:27:38 -0400
Date: 13 Sep 2002 15:27:38 -0400

On Fri, 2002-09-13 at 14:33, vernon wrote:
> 
> But only some of the mail is actually being scanned which leads me to
> believe that not all of the mail is actually hitting that box and the 10
> never goes down. Why? Have I got something confused here?
> 
Sending mail directly to a backup mail server in the hopes that it has
less stringent spam scanning is a common spammer trick.

-- 
Jason Kohles                                 jkohles@redhat.com
Senior Engineer                 Red Hat Professional Consulting



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk


