From spamassassin-talk-admin@lists.sourceforge.net  Sun Sep  8 23:57:37 2002
Return-Path: <spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.spamassassin.taint.org
Received: from localhost (jalapeno [127.0.0.1])
	by jmason.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3215C16F1A
	for <jm@localhost>; Sun,  8 Sep 2002 23:51:55 +0100 (IST)
Received: from jalapeno [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Sun, 08 Sep 2002 23:51:55 +0100 (IST)
Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
    [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
    g88EIdC32338 for <jm-sa@jmason.org>; Sun, 8 Sep 2002 15:18:44 +0100
Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
    helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
    esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17o2t3-0004jQ-00; Sun,
    08 Sep 2002 07:18:05 -0700
Received: from mailout10.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.21]) by
    usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id
    17o2rz-0005Ts-00 for <spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>;
    Sun, 08 Sep 2002 07:16:59 -0700
Received: from fwd00.sul.t-online.de by mailout10.sul.t-online.com with
    smtp id 17o2rv-0003dY-00; Sun, 08 Sep 2002 16:16:55 +0200
Received: from nebukadnezar.msquadrat.de
    (520061089980-0001@[62.226.214.55]) by fmrl00.sul.t-online.com with esmtp
    id 17o2rr-1VybIWC; Sun, 8 Sep 2002 16:16:51 +0200
Received: from otherland (otherland.msquadrat.de [10.10.10.10]) by
    nebukadnezar.msquadrat.de (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.3 (i386)) with ESMTP id
    F3CD32E9 for <spamassassin-talk@lists.sf.net>; Sun,  8 Sep 2002 16:16:50
    +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
From: "Malte S. Stretz" <msquadrat.nospamplease@gmx.net>
To: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Lotus Notes users?
User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3
References: <DDAC0C3D-C298-11D6-B93E-00039396ECF2@hughes-family.org>
    <yf2admta41m.fsf@proton.pathname.com>
In-Reply-To: <yf2admta41m.fsf@proton.pathname.com>
X-Accept-Language: de, en
X-Habeas-Swe-1: winter into spring
X-Habeas-Swe-2: brightly anticipated
X-Habeas-Swe-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)
X-Habeas-Swe-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)
X-Habeas-Swe-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this
X-Habeas-Swe-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas
X-Habeas-Swe-7: Warrant Mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant
X-Habeas-Swe-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this
X-Habeas-Swe-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report/>.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <200209081619.34777@malte.stretz.eu.org>
X-Sender: 520061089980-0001@t-dialin.net
Sender: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net
X-Beenthere: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@example.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net>
List-Subscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
    <mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Talk about SpamAssassin <spamassassin-talk.example.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
    <mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=spamassassin-talk>
X-Original-Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 16:19:34 +0200
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2002 16:19:34 +0200

On Saturday 07 September 2002 23:22 CET Daniel Quinlan wrote:
> Craig Hughes <craig@hughes-family.org> writes:
> > How about configuring SA to set precendence to "low" for spam
> > messages, then filter on that -- no real human I've ever seen has
> > actually set precendence to low on real mail.
>
> Assuming there isn't a better way for Lotus Notes users, we could
> create a "Precedence: spam" convention.  The only two Precedence:
> headers I've seen (aside from one or two odd messages) are "bulk" and
> "list".  Adding a "spam" header makes sense given the convention.

I'd suggest using Precedence: junk. Albeit it's no standard header does most 
Software already recognize it. Courier eg. doesn't send auto-replies to 
mails with the Precedence bulk or junk. I think Outlook does handle these 
special, too. [1] says:
| Autoresponses should always contain the header
|          Precedence: junk
| Notice the spelling of "prec-e-dence". In particular, count the number of
| n:s (and a:s and s:es, if you're totally agraphic and/or from the United
| States). This will prevent well-tempered mail programs from generating
| bounce messages for these. If the recipient can't be reached, the
| autoresponder message is simply discarded. 
| [...]
| (For what it's worth, the meaning of the Precedence header in practice is
| that it affects Sendmail so that messages identified as less important get
| moved back in the queue under high load. [...])

>[...]

Malte

[1] Moronic Mail Autoresponders (A FAQ From Hell):
http://www.ling.helsinki.fi/users/reriksso/mail/autoresponder-faq.html
-- 
--- Coding is art.
-- 




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk


