From exmh-users-admin@redhat.com  Tue Jul 30 02:23:39 2002
Return-Path: <exmh-users-admin@spamassassin.taint.org>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE7BF440EE
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 21:23:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Tue, 30 Jul 2002 02:23:39 +0100 (IST)
Received: from listman.spamassassin.taint.org (listman.spamassassin.taint.org [66.187.233.211]) by
    dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g6U1HJq29795 for
    <jm-exmh@jmason.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2002 02:17:22 +0100
Received: from listman.spamassassin.taint.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
    listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C643EB22; Mon, 29 Jul 2002
    21:15:25 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: exmh-users@listman.spamassassin.taint.org
Received: from int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org (int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org
    [172.16.52.254]) by listman.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7142E3EA16
    for <exmh-users@listman.redhat.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 21:14:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mail@localhost) by int-mx1.corp.spamassassin.taint.org (8.11.6/8.11.6)
    id g6U1EUh27998 for exmh-users@listman.redhat.com; Mon, 29 Jul 2002
    21:14:30 -0400
Received: from mx1.spamassassin.taint.org (mx1.spamassassin.taint.org [172.16.48.31]) by
    int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g6U1ETq27992 for
    <exmh-users@redhat.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 21:14:29 -0400
Received: from orion.dwf.com (bgp01360964bgs.sandia01.nm.comcast.net
    [68.35.68.128]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id
    g6U12Il10341 for <exmh-users@redhat.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 21:02:18 -0400
Received: from orion.dwf.com (localhost.dwf.com [127.0.0.1]) by
    orion.dwf.com (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g6U1ENO8002427 for
    <exmh-users@redhat.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 19:14:23 -0600
Received: from orion.dwf.com (reg@localhost) by orion.dwf.com
    (8.12.1/8.12.1/Submit) with ESMTP id g6U1ENSe002423 for
    <exmh-users@redhat.com>; Mon, 29 Jul 2002 19:14:23 -0600
Message-Id: <200207300114.g6U1ENSe002423@orion.dwf.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/25/2002 with nmh-1.0.4
To: exmh-users@spamassassin.taint.org
Subject: Re: Strange tcl/tk messages from EXMH 2.5...
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 25 Jul 2002 21:13:51 MDT."
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Reg Clemens <reg@dwf.com>
X-Loop: exmh-users@spamassassin.taint.org
Sender: exmh-users-admin@spamassassin.taint.org
Errors-To: exmh-users-admin@spamassassin.taint.org
X-Beenthere: exmh-users@spamassassin.taint.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.1
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: exmh-users@spamassassin.taint.org
List-Help: <mailto:exmh-users-request@spamassassin.taint.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:exmh-users@spamassassin.taint.org>
List-Subscribe: <https://listman.spamassassin.taint.org/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users>,
    <mailto:exmh-users-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Discussion list for EXMH users <exmh-users.spamassassin.taint.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://listman.spamassassin.taint.org/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users>,
    <mailto:exmh-users-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://listman.spamassassin.taint.org/mailman/private/exmh-users/>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 19:14:23 -0600

> 
> I am getting some strange messages from EXMH 2.5.
> Since I just finished reinstalling it, I dont see how something could be
> missing. Here is the message:
> 
> When the Compose or Reply windows first come up, I get a popup that says:
>     Invalid I-spell style: 'extr switch with no body' changing to underline
> 
> Any thoughts??? I this complaining about a EXMH routine being missing?
> Or What???
> -- 
>                                         Reg.Clemens
>                                         reg@dwf.com
> 
> 

Let me answer my own question.
This seems to be a problem in tk8.4.
There is a switch statement at lines 691-697 in ispell.tcl inside a catch.
It ends with a line ending with a backslash, followed by a blank line.

This seems to be enough to confuse this verson of tk.  Removing the backslash
causes the error to go away, and the catch is not executed.
-- 
                                        Reg.Clemens
                                        reg@dwf.com




_______________________________________________
Exmh-users mailing list
Exmh-users@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/exmh-users


