From spamassassin-talk-admin@lists.sourceforge.net  Mon Aug 26 16:57:12 2002
Return-Path: <spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net>
Delivered-To: yyyy@localhost.netnoteinc.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5CBF44157
	for <jm@localhost>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 11:57:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phobos [127.0.0.1]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.9.0)
	for jm@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:57:05 +0100 (IST)
Received: from usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (usw-sf-fw2.sourceforge.net
    [216.136.171.252]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
    g7QFoqZ31545 for <jm-sa@jmason.org>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:50:52 +0100
Received: from usw-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
    helo=usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net) by usw-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with
    esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 17jM70-0006iM-00; Mon,
    26 Aug 2002 08:49:06 -0700
Received: from [212.2.188.179] (helo=mandark.labs.netnoteinc.com) by
    usw-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id
    17jM6V-0003PE-00 for <spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net>;
    Mon, 26 Aug 2002 08:48:36 -0700
Received: from phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com
    [192.168.2.14]) by mandark.labs.netnoteinc.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP
    id g7QFmQ500742; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:48:26 +0100
Received: by phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id
    542CD43F99; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 11:46:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from phobos (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
    phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C96933D8B;
    Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:46:26 +0100 (IST)
To: "Craig R.Hughes" <craig@deersoft.com>
Cc: Bart Schaefer <schaefer@zanshin.com>,
	spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] 2.40 RELEASE: oops -- newer freqs.
In-Reply-To: Message from
    "Craig R.Hughes"
    <craig@deersoft.com> of
    "Mon, 26 Aug 2002 08:31:03 PDT."
    <D4B33CBA-B908-11D6-9F1A-00039396ECF2@deersoft.com>
From: yyyy@spamassassin.taint.org (Justin Mason)
X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: 0A48 2D8B 0B52 A87D 0E8A  6ADD 4137 1B50 6E58 EF0A
X-Habeas-Swe-1: winter into spring
X-Habeas-Swe-2: brightly anticipated
X-Habeas-Swe-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)
X-Habeas-Swe-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)
X-Habeas-Swe-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this
X-Habeas-Swe-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas
X-Habeas-Swe-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant
X-Habeas-Swe-8: Message (HCM) and not spam.  Please report use of this
X-Habeas-Swe-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report/>.
Message-Id: <20020826154626.542CD43F99@phobos.labs.netnoteinc.com>
Sender: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net
Errors-To: spamassassin-talk-admin@example.sourceforge.net
X-Beenthere: spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@example.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:spamassassin-talk@example.sourceforge.net>
List-Subscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
    <mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Talk about SpamAssassin <spamassassin-talk.example.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://example.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
    <mailto:spamassassin-talk-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.geocrawler.com/redir-sf.php3?list=spamassassin-talk>
X-Original-Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:46:21 +0100
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 16:46:21 +0100


"Craig R.Hughes" said:

> The GA run on the current corpus is yielding an average (mean) 
> score for false-positives of about 10 points, which is higher 
> than before.  There's some tweaking to be done yet (rule 
> elimination and such), so that will likely fall, but -15 might 
> not be enough of a correction in many situations.  I will set 
> the scores for the Habeas stuff and the Ironport stuff to be 
> sensible given:
> 
> a) estimated likeliness of compliance with Habeas/Bonded sender 
> rules, and
> b) score correction level needed to achieve purposes of those projects.

Using the score-ranges stuff and my aggressive anti-FP evaluation code,
BTW, yielded an average FP of 5.7 points, with 0.67% FPs and 96.57%
overall accuracy -- but I notice you went back to the other method.
Just pointing this out ;)

--j.


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
Spamassassin-talk@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

