"use strict";Object.defineProperties(exports,{__esModule:{value:!0},[Symbol.toStringTag]:{value:"Module"}});const _=require("./lib/ReactPropTypesSecret.js"),E=require("./lib/has.js");var u,p;function b(){if(p)return u;p=1;var s=function(){};if(process.env.NODE_ENV!=="production"){var l=_.__require(),a={},d=E.__require();s=function(r){var t="Warning: "+r;typeof console<"u"&&console.error(t);try{throw new Error(t)}catch{}}}function f(r,t,i,o,c){if(process.env.NODE_ENV!=="production"){for(var n in r)if(d(r,n)){var e;try{if(typeof r[n]!="function"){var h=Error((o||"React class")+": "+i+" type `"+n+"` is invalid; it must be a function, usually from the `prop-types` package, but received `"+typeof r[n]+"`.This often happens because of typos such as `PropTypes.function` instead of `PropTypes.func`.");throw h.name="Invariant Violation",h}e=r[n](t,n,o,i,null,l)}catch(y){e=y}if(e&&!(e instanceof Error)&&s((o||"React class")+": type specification of "+i+" `"+n+"` is invalid; the type checker function must return `null` or an `Error` but returned a "+typeof e+". You may have forgotten to pass an argument to the type checker creator (arrayOf, instanceOf, objectOf, oneOf, oneOfType, and shape all require an argument)."),e instanceof Error&&!(e.message in a)){a[e.message]=!0;var v=c?c():"";s("Failed "+i+" type: "+e.message+(v!=null?v:""))}}}}return f.resetWarningCache=function(){process.env.NODE_ENV!=="production"&&(a={})},u=f,u}exports.__require=b;
//# sourceMappingURL=checkPropTypes.js.map
