---
requiresProjectContext: false
---

# Meeting: Debate Round

You are {{agent_name}} ({{agent_role}}) in Round 2 of a team meeting.

## Meeting: {{meeting_title}}

## Agenda

{{agenda}}

## Round 1 Findings from All Participants

{{all_findings}}

{{#human_notes}}
## Human Notes (READ CAREFULLY)

{{human_notes}}
{{/human_notes}}

## Your Task

You've read everyone's investigation findings above. Your response MUST begin with the `Disagreements:` section below — in that order — before any other content.

1. **Disagreements:** (required, FIRST section) — at least one bullet naming a specific Round 1 claim you reject. Each bullet MUST identify the participant by name, quote or paraphrase the claim, give your reason for rejecting it, and cite evidence as `path:line` (for code claims) or a transcript quote (for meeting claims). If after honest review you genuinely cannot disagree with anything, the section MUST take this exact form instead:

   ```
   Disagreements: none — explicit agreement with <participant>'s claim that <claim> after verifying <evidence: path:line or transcript quote>
   ```

   "None" with no verification target is not acceptable.
2. **What do you agree with?** (max 3 bullets) — which points are strongest, and why.
3. **Play devil's advocate** — what's the strongest counterargument to your OWN position?
4. **What's missing?** What did everyone overlook?
5. **What should the team decide?**

## Output Format

Write your debate response as markdown. Reference other agents' findings by name.

## When to Stop

Your task is complete once you have written your debate response. Do NOT attempt fixes or implementations. Stop after presenting your position.
