Skip to content
Chat history
ChatGPT
New chat
Search chats
Codex
More
GPTs
HWP 읽어 주는 GPT, HWP.Chat
Explore GPTs
Projects
New project
ㄱㅁㅌ
리드세션
비주류 경제학
ai_top_100
AI쌀먹
More
Recents
Patch Verification Request
Agbrowse Peer Comparison
Milkdown WYSIWYG Math Support
CLI-Jaw Notes WYSIWYG Review
Code review assistance
CLI-Jaw 23.0 Audit
SESN Response
익썸 작성 요청
Reply AGBR
AGBR request
WYSIWYG Implementation Readiness
Agbrowse vs Competitors Analysis
원료 다변화 압력
2nd Nature BM 분석
셀룰로오스 나노섬유 화장품 활용
폐기 식품 기업 재검증
미국 푸드 업사이클링 AI 업체
아보카도 업사이클링 문제
식품 공정 생산량
푸드 업사이클 원재료
농업 부산물 활용 아이디어
옷 염색 피부 반응 AI
못난이 농산물 시장 규모
비열 처리 기술 활용
AI 기반 푸드업사이클링
Rich Authoring Plan Review
Patch Implementation Critique
Editor Dark Mode Fix
Gepete Chat
Pro
Share
web-ai-context-package-1777588344395.md
File
[USER]
## Question
You are reviewing the actual source of agbrowse, a standalone Node CLI that drives a real Chrome via Playwright + Chrome DevTools Protocol so an AI agent can use ChatGPT, Gemini, and Grok web UIs the same way a human would.

Repository: https://github.com/lidge-jun/agbrowse  (npm: npm install -g agbrowse)

The attached markdown bundle contains the production source: README, three skill guides (browser / web-ai / vision-click), the agbrowse web-ai runtime (cli.mjs, question.mjs, chatgpt.mjs, gemini-live.mjs, grok-live.mjs, model pickers, composer/attachment primitives, context-pack builder/renderer/file-selector, session/baseline persistence), and the browser core helpers. Read the bundle before answering. If something is genuinely ambiguous, say so explicitly instead of guessing.

# What I want

Compare agbrowse against the closest peers and propose concrete improvements. Use web search to ground every claim about a competitor or a provider DOM behavior, and cite the source URL inline as [Source: <url>] next to the claim. Do not invent capabilities you cannot verify.

# Peers

- Oracle (openclaw oracle CLI) — second-model consultation that auto-compresses context server-side.
- browser-use (Python, https://github.com/browser-use/browser-use).
- Anthropic Computer Use (mouse/keyboard tool API on the Claude API).
- Microsoft playwright-mcp and other MCP browser servers.
- Plain Playwright/Puppeteer scripts wrapped behind agent tool calls.

# Output (markdown, terse)

## 1. Where agbrowse meaningfully differs

For each peer above, 2–4 bullets across these axes: control surface, transparency of context/prompt, model coverage, fail-closed semantics, agent-friendliness of --help and skill output, login/profile reuse. Cite competitor docs.

## 2. Top 5 concrete improvements

For each: one-line rationale, one-line implementation hint, and which file(s) it touches based on the attached source.

## 3. Missing agent-friendliness

Bullets on: error taxonomy, retry hints, schema-ready capability rows, structured snapshot diffs, watcher reattach, session resume — only flag what is genuinely missing in the attached source.

## 4. Risk areas / footguns before broader adoption

Cover: provider DOM churn, anti-bot/Cloudflare, login state sharing across Chrome instances, baseline-key collisions (vendor:url), Grok context-pack soft warning vs hard block, --port collisions when run alongside cli-jaw browser.

## 5. Ship-one-first

One paragraph: "If I had to ship one change first, it would be ___ because ___."

[INSTRUCTIONS]
Use web search whenever possible to verify facts and gather up-to-date information. Cite the sources inline in the response body next to the claims they support (for example: [Source: <url-or-title>]).
Show more
web-ai-context-package-1777589266772.md
File
[USER]
## Question
Follow-up to your prior peer review. I split the implementation into phase files under devlog/ (legacy moved to devlog/_legacy/). The attached bundle has the index + 6 phase files (Phase 0 papercuts, Phase 1 sessions ⭐, Phase 2 errors, Phase 3 capabilities, Phase 4 diagnostics, Phase 5 adoption). The agbrowse source code is unchanged from your previous pass.

# What I want now

Make each phase concrete enough to implement directly. Use web search only when verifying a specific provider DOM claim or competitor behavior; cite as [Source: <url>] inline. Otherwise rely on the attached source from the previous pass.

For each phase, answer the four questions below. Be specific — "add a session id" is not useful; "add a 26-char ULID generated via crypto.getRandomValues with timestamp prefix, persisted in createSession" is.

## Per-phase questions

1. **Decisions still missing** — list every "Open question" in the phase file and give your recommendation with one-sentence reasoning.
2. **Exact diff sketches** — for each MODIFY entry, sketch the actual code change as a before/after snippet (file path + 5–15 lines). For each NEW file, sketch the exported API signatures and a 10-line skeleton.
3. **Dependency graph + slicing** — does this phase actually slice into one PR, or does it need to split? If split, propose 2–3 sub-PRs with explicit ordering.
4. **Risk this phase introduces** — name the most likely regression and the test that would catch it.

## Cross-phase asks

A. **Sequencing critique** — does the 0 → 1 → (2/3/4 in parallel) → 5 ordering hold up? Where would you reorder, and why?

B. **What's missing from the plan entirely** — list any GPT-Pro-flagged item from your prior review (top 5 improvements, missing agent-friendliness, footguns) that does **not** map cleanly to a phase file. Tell me which phase should absorb it or whether it deserves its own phase.

C. **Drop list** — anything in the plan you think is over-engineering for an early-stage open-source CLI? Be blunt.

D. **One-week reality check** — for each phase, give a rough engineer-day estimate (assume 1 engineer, no full-time, evening work) and flag which phases cannot fit a one-week iteration as currently scoped.

# Output

- Markdown.
- One H2 per phase, then one H2 each for sections A–D.
- Keep each bullet short. Code snippets up to 15 lines each.
- End with a one-paragraph "If I had to cut this to a 4-week sprint, the cut order would be: …".

[INSTRUCTIONS]
Use web search whenever possible to verify facts and gather up-to-date information. Cite the sources inline in the response body next to the claims they support (for example: [Source: <url-or-title>]).
Show more
web-ai-context-package-1777592078462.md
File
[USER]
## Question
Final close-out pass on the agbrowse phased plan.

# Repos and current state

- agbrowse (npm agbrowse, standalone .mjs CLI):
  https://github.com/lidge-jun/agbrowse
  - main HEAD: 32618a7 (devlog dual-repo mirror sections)
  - earlier this session: 1b4b238 (devlog v2), 3c1ea8e (Phase 0 papercuts + research instructions + longer polls)
- cli-jaw (production runtime, .ts, HTTP-routed):
  https://github.com/lidge-jun/cli-jaw
  - master HEAD: 3d54c1f (mirror agbrowse Phase 0 + earlier improvements)
- cli-jaw-skills (skills_ref submodule):
  https://github.com/lidge-jun/cli-jaw-skills
  - main HEAD: 256956c (Phase 0 hard-gate + agbrowse alternative section)

Phase 0 has shipped end to end on both repos plus the skills submodule.
Devlog is now 00_index.md plus phase files 01..07_*.md, each ending with a
## cli-jaw mirror section that maps the work between agbrowse and cli-jaw.
The attached bundle has the **updated devlog** (new mirror sections + the
revised 00_index dual-repo strategy). The agbrowse source bundle from your
earlier passes is still valid — no source changes since I last sent the
source.

# What I want from this pass

You're closing the plan. Be brutal — the goal is to lock it before any more
phases start.

## Per-phase questions

For each of Phase 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6:

1. **Mirror correctness** — with both repos in mind, does the new cli-jaw mirror section accurately reflect what's already in cli-jaw? (You have to use web search to verify any specific cli-jaw filename or symbol I claim exists; cite as [Source: <github.com/lidge-jun/cli-jaw/...>].)
2. **Sequencing under dual-repo** — does the agbrowse-first-then-cli-jaw rule actually work for this phase, or does the phase need to start in cli-jaw because cli-jaw is the leader? (Phase 3 and Phase 6 already say so; check Phase 5 and Phase 1 again.)
3. **Single-line risk** — name the most likely thing to go wrong and the smallest test that catches it.

## Cross-phase asks

A. **Plan close-out** — anything still missing now that the dual-repo strategy is documented? If yes, name it and tell me which phase should absorb it. If no, say "plan is closed, proceed".

B. **First action of Phase 2 PR1** — after this consult I'm going to start Phase 2 PR1 (errors core). Give me the exact first three file edits in order, in agbrowse, with file paths and one-line summaries each. No code blocks needed.

C. **Cross-repo error-shape parity check** — agbrowse will adopt WebAiError first; cli-jaw replaces stageError. Are there any cli-jaw call sites that throw structured errors today (beyond stageError) that I should preserve as separate errorCodes? If yes, list them.

D. **One-paragraph signoff** — if you'd ship this plan as is, write the one paragraph "this plan is closed and Phase 2 starts on agbrowse web-ai/errors.mjs because ___". If you wouldn't, write the one paragraph "do not start yet because ___".

# Output

- Markdown.
- One H2 per phase, then one H2 each for A–D.
- Cite specific cli-jaw paths/symbols with [Source: <url>].
- Keep it terse. No code blocks.

[INSTRUCTIONS]
Use web search whenever possible to verify facts and gather up-to-date information. Cite the sources inline in the response body next to the claims they support (for example: [Source: <url-or-title>]).
Show more
[USER]
## Question
Phase 0 / 1 / 2 / 3 PR1 are now shipped end-to-end across both repos plus the skills submodule. This is the admit pass — does the implementation match the plan as agreed in your earlier close-out, or did anything drift? Feel free to web-search the GitHub commits I cite below to verify.

# Repo state

- agbrowse (https://github.com/lidge-jun/agbrowse) main HEAD: ab27174
  - 3c1ea8e Phase 0 papercuts
  - d7763fe Phase 2 PR1 errors core
  - 3017421 Phase 2 PR2 throws → WebAiError
  - bd53ac5 Phase 1 PR1 session-store.mjs (ULID + lock)
  - 9bc7803 Phase 1 PR2 provider session integration
  - 0709963 Phase 1 PR3 sessions list/show/resume/reattach/prune CLI
  - 97412bb docs polish (README + helps)
  - ab27174 Phase 3 PR1 capability runtime + status capabilities[]

- cli-jaw (https://github.com/lidge-jun/cli-jaw) master HEAD: b0bb62a
  - 3d54c1f Phase 0 mirror
  - 418040c Phase 2 mirror (WebAiError + fromCliJawStructuredError)
  - 5e11ad5 Phase 1 mirror (sessions-prune)
  - b0bb62a Phase 3 mirror (status capabilities[] + --probe)

- cli-jaw-skills (https://github.com/lidge-jun/cli-jaw-skills) main HEAD: 434b3f6
  - 256956c Phase 0 hard-gate + agbrowse alternative
  - 030406d Phase 2 Error taxonomy
  - 434b3f6 Phase 3 Runtime capabilities

Source bundle from your earlier passes is still valid. The new files since then are small and listed below; please web-fetch any of these on github.com and verify.

New / modified since the close-out you signed off:
- agbrowse: web-ai/errors.mjs · web-ai/session-store.mjs · web-ai/capability.mjs · all three web-ai/{chatgpt,gemini-live,grok-live}.mjs · web-ai/cli.mjs · web-ai/question.mjs · skills/web-ai/SKILL.md · 4 new test files.
- cli-jaw: src/browser/web-ai/errors.ts · src/browser/web-ai/capability-registry.ts (existing) read by status() · src/browser/web-ai/session.ts (pruneSessions) · src/browser/web-ai/chatgpt.ts (status capabilities[] + sessionsPrune wrapper + stageError mapper) · src/routes/browser.ts (sessions/prune + status probe) · bin/commands/browser-web-ai.ts (sessions-prune + --probe) · 3 new test files.
- skills submodule: web-ai/SKILL.md gained Error taxonomy + Runtime capabilities sections.

# Admit checklist

For each item, answer one of: **shipped-as-planned**, **drifted-acceptably** (with one-sentence why), **drifted-broken** (with the breakage and the smallest fix), **not-yet-started**.

1. Phase 0 ChatGPT three-tier baseline fallback (agbrowse only) — same-host > vendor-latest fallback in pollWebAi.
2. Phase 0 Grok hard-gate with --allow-grok-context-pack + grok.context-pack-not-allowed errorCode (both repos).
3. Phase 0 foreign CDP warning when launchChrome reuses an external CDP (both repos).
4. Phase 2 PR1 WebAiError class + wrapError + toErrorJson + CLI top-level wrap with AGBROWSE_JSON_ERRORS=1 env (agbrowse).
5. Phase 2 PR2 throw site conversions across web-ai/** (agbrowse); 14-code catalog populated.
6. Phase 2 mirror: cli-jaw errors.ts + fromCliJawStructuredError mapping WrongTargetError → cdp.target-mismatch, BrowserCapabilityError → capability.unsupported, ProviderRuntimeDisabledError → provider.runtime-disabled. toWebAiHttpError and toWebAiErrorEnvelope delegate when typed.
7. Phase 1 PR1 session-store.mjs with 26-char Crockford ULID, withStoreLock cross-process serialization, pruneSessions. Concurrent-write test covers Pro's flagged risk.
8. Phase 1 PR2 provider integration: send returns sessionId, poll resolves via input.session > findActiveSession (targetId > conversationUrl > vendor-latest) > legacy baseline, complete/timeout updateSession, query forwards sent.sessionId.
9. Phase 1 PR3 web-ai sessions list/show/resume/reattach/prune CLI subcommands. ULID prefix sortable. parseDurationToMs supports s/m/h/d/w with default unit d. reattach honors --navigate.
10. Phase 1 cli-jaw mirror: pruneSessions + sessionsPrune wrapper + POST /api/browser/web-ai/sessions/prune route + sessions-prune flat top-level CLI. Naming divergence (cli-jaw flat vs agbrowse subcommand) intentional and documented.
11. Phase 3 PR1 agbrowse: web-ai/capability.mjs (defineCapability/runCapabilities/worstCapabilityState/probeHostMatches/probeFirstVisibleSelector); each vendor exports <vendor>Capabilities array with hyphenated IDs (chatgpt-active-tab-verification, chatgpt-composer-visible, …); statusWebAi for all three vendors returns { ok, capabilities[], capabilityState, … }. Side-effect contract documented (probes never submit, menu openers close).
12. Phase 3 PR1 cli-jaw: status() reads listCapabilitySchemas({ vendor }) and embeds the rows; --probe <capabilityId> filter wired through CLI → route → runtime.
13. Hyphenated capability ID convention locked in both repos so a shared catalog is reachable in PR2.

# Asks

A. Anything in the above 13 items that drifted in a way that breaks Phase 3 PR2 or Phase 4 doctor?

B. The single biggest follow-up risk you'd flag before Phase 4 doctor work begins?

C. One-paragraph admit: "I admit Phase 0/1/2/3 PR1 as shipped because ___. Move on to Phase 3 PR2 / Phase 4 because ___." or, if drift is unacceptable, "Pause and fix ___ before going further."

# Output

- Markdown.
- Cite specific GitHub commit hashes or file paths in [Source: ...] form when you verify.
- Keep it terse. No code blocks unless flagging a fix.

[INSTRUCTIONS]
Use web search whenever possible to verify facts and gather up-to-date information. Cite the sources inline in the response body next to the claims they support (for example: [Source: <url-or-title>]).
Show more

I’ll treat this as an admit audit: verify the shipped files at the cited commits, then classify each checklist item against the agreed plan and call out only real drift.

Two concrete drift candidates are emerging: cli-jaw may lose Grok’s typed hard-gate errorCode, and ChatGPT wrong-tab status may fail before emitting capability rows.

Thought for 5m 27s

Checked against the updated devlog baseline. 

web-ai-context-package-17775920…

Admit checklist

shipped-as-planned — ChatGPT poll now does strict URL → same-host latest → vendor-latest, and getLatestBaseline has the host filter. [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/agbrowse/blob/ab27174/web-ai/chatgpt.mjs
] [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/agbrowse/blob/ab27174/web-ai/session.mjs
]

drifted-broken — agbrowse throws typed grok.context-pack-not-allowed, but cli-jaw still throws a plain Error with only stage, so cli-jaw loses errorCode. Smallest fix: import WebAiError in src/browser/web-ai/grok-live.ts and throw the typed error in the hard-gate branch. [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/agbrowse/blob/ab27174/web-ai/grok-live.mjs
] [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/cli-jaw/blob/b0bb62a/src/browser/web-ai/grok-live.ts
]

shipped-as-planned — both repos warn, not fail, on external CDP reuse. [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/agbrowse/blob/ab27174/skills/browser/browser.mjs
] [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/cli-jaw/blob/b0bb62a/src/browser/connection.ts
]

shipped-as-planned — agbrowse has WebAiError, wrapError, toErrorJson, AGBROWSE_JSON_ERRORS=1, CLI wrapping, and duplicate-print suppression through alreadyReported. [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/agbrowse/blob/ab27174/web-ai/errors.mjs
] [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/agbrowse/blob/ab27174/web-ai/cli.mjs
] [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/agbrowse/blob/ab27174/skills/browser/browser.mjs
]

drifted-broken — catalog is populated, and main provider/context-pack paths are much better, but public-path helper throws remain plain in *-model.mjs and chatgpt-composer.mjs; those become internal.unhandled instead of provider.model-mismatch, provider.composer-not-visible, or provider.commit-not-verified. Smallest fix: convert model/composer helper throws or wrap each provider call site. [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/agbrowse/blob/ab27174/web-ai/errors.mjs
] [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/agbrowse/blob/ab27174/web-ai/chatgpt-model.mjs
] [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/agbrowse/blob/ab27174/web-ai/gemini-model.mjs
] [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/agbrowse/blob/ab27174/web-ai/grok-model.mjs
] [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/agbrowse/blob/ab27174/web-ai/chatgpt-composer.mjs
]

drifted-broken — cli-jaw mappings shipped, and HTTP preserves typed fields, but toWebAiErrorEnvelope only keeps typed message/stage and drops errorCode/retryHint/vendor/evidence. Smallest fix: extend WebAiErrorEnvelope and spread toJSON() fields into the typed branch. [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/cli-jaw/blob/b0bb62a/src/browser/web-ai/errors.ts
] [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/cli-jaw/blob/b0bb62a/src/routes/browser.ts
] [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/cli-jaw/blob/b0bb62a/src/browser/web-ai/diagnostics.ts
]

drifted-acceptably — ULID, lock file, prune, and 25 parallel insert test shipped; the test is same-process concurrency, not a spawned cross-process CLI test, but the lock implementation itself is cross-process-oriented. [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/agbrowse/blob/ab27174/web-ai/session-store.mjs
] [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/agbrowse/blob/ab27174/test/unit/web-ai-session-store.test.mjs
]

shipped-as-planned — provider send returns sessionId; query forwards sent.sessionId; poll resolves explicit session / active session / legacy baseline and updates complete/timeout state. [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/agbrowse/blob/ab27174/web-ai/chatgpt.mjs
] [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/agbrowse/blob/ab27174/web-ai/gemini-live.mjs
] [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/agbrowse/blob/ab27174/web-ai/grok-live.mjs
] [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/agbrowse/blob/ab27174/web-ai/session.mjs
]

shipped-as-planned — sessions list/show/resume/reattach/prune, sortable ULID prefix, duration parser with s/m/h/d/w, default unit d, and reattach --navigate are present. [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/agbrowse/blob/ab27174/web-ai/cli.mjs
] [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/agbrowse/blob/ab27174/test/unit/web-ai-session-store.test.mjs
]

shipped-as-planned — cli-jaw has pruneSessions, sessionsPrune, POST /api/browser/web-ai/sessions/prune, and flat sessions-prune; flat-vs-subcommand divergence is intentional. [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/cli-jaw/blob/b0bb62a/src/browser/web-ai/session.ts
] [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/cli-jaw/blob/b0bb62a/src/browser/web-ai/chatgpt.ts
] [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/cli-jaw/blob/b0bb62a/src/routes/browser.ts
] [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/cli-jaw/blob/b0bb62a/bin/commands/browser-web-ai.ts
]

drifted-broken — capability runtime and hyphenated IDs shipped, but ChatGPT statusWebAi calls requireChatGptPage before runCapabilities, so chatgpt-active-tab-verification cannot return a fail row on the wrong tab. Smallest fix: use deps.getPage() in ChatGPT status and let the host probe produce the row. [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/agbrowse/blob/ab27174/web-ai/capability.mjs
] [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/agbrowse/blob/ab27174/web-ai/chatgpt.mjs
] [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/agbrowse/blob/ab27174/web-ai/gemini-live.mjs
] [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/agbrowse/blob/ab27174/web-ai/grok-live.mjs
]

shipped-as-planned — cli-jaw status() reads listCapabilitySchemas({ vendor }), embeds rows, and --probe is wired CLI → route → runtime. [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/cli-jaw/blob/b0bb62a/src/browser/web-ai/chatgpt.ts
] [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/cli-jaw/blob/b0bb62a/src/routes/browser.ts
] [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/cli-jaw/blob/b0bb62a/bin/commands/browser-web-ai.ts
]

shipped-as-planned — hyphenated capability IDs are locked in both repos; agbrowse mirrors cli-jaw’s convention. [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/agbrowse/blob/ab27174/web-ai/capability.mjs
] [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/agbrowse/blob/ab27174/skills/web-ai/SKILL.md
] [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/cli-jaw/blob/b0bb62a/src/browser/web-ai/capability-registry.ts
] [Source: https://github.com/lidge-jun/cli-jaw-skills/blob/434b3f6/web-ai/SKILL.md
]

A. Breaks Phase 3 PR2 or Phase 4 doctor?

Yes, but all are small preflight fixes, not plan rewrites.

Phase 3 PR2 blocker: untyped model helper throws will hide model-picker failures behind internal.unhandled.

Phase 4 blocker: ChatGPT status cannot emit wrong-tab capability rows; doctor needs that row.

Phase 4 parity blocker: cli-jaw toWebAiErrorEnvelope drops typed fields; doctor/diagnose should preserve errorCode.

Parity blocker: cli-jaw Grok hard-gate lacks grok.context-pack-not-allowed; fix before cross-repo error-shape tests.

B. Biggest follow-up risk before Phase 4 doctor

The biggest risk is capability row shape divergence: agbrowse status emits live probe rows { capabilityId, state, evidence, next }, while cli-jaw status embeds registry schema rows with richer static fields. Before doctor, define a tiny adapter so both doctor implementations consume one normalized feature row shape.

C. Admit / pause

Pause and fix four small items before going further: type the cli-jaw Grok context-pack hard-gate, finish agbrowse public helper throw conversions for model/composer paths, make ChatGPT status run capability probes before fail-closed host verification, and preserve typed fields in cli-jaw toWebAiErrorEnvelope. After that, Phase 0/1/2/3 PR1 are admissible and Phase 3 PR2 / Phase 4 can proceed without carrying hidden error-shape and status-row debt.

Sources
Sources

Pro
ChatGPT can make mistakes. Check important info. See Cookie Preferences.
