# Perspective Templates by Domain

When generating perspectives for multi-perspective analysis, use these templates as starting points. Each template provides 4–5 disciplinary lenses tailored to the research domain.

| If the research is about... | Consider these lenses |
|----------------------------|----------------------|
| Human-AI collaboration | Cognitive psychologist, HCI researcher, organisational economist, ethicist, systems engineer |
| MCDM / preference elicitation | Decision theorist, behavioural economist, operations researcher, UX researcher, philosopher of rationality |
| Multi-agent systems | Game theorist, mechanism designer, complexity scientist, political economist, social choice theorist |
| Organisational behaviour | Sociologist, micro-economist, evolutionary psychologist, management scientist, institutional theorist |
| Environmental/carbon policy | Environmental economist, political scientist, energy engineer, regulatory lawyer, behavioural scientist |

## Perspective Definition Template

Each perspective should be defined by these dimensions:

| Field | Description |
|-------|-------------|
| **Label** | Short name (e.g., "Behavioural Economist", "Organisational Theorist") |
| **Discipline** | Academic field and tradition |
| **Epistemic prior** | What this perspective takes as given, and what it questions |
| **Methodological preference** | Preferred empirical approach and evidence standards |
| **Likely concern** | What this perspective would worry about most |

## Rules for Perspective Generation

- At least one perspective must be **methodologically sceptical** (e.g., econometrician focused on identification)
- At least one must come from a **different discipline** than the paper's primary field
- At least one must prioritise **practical/policy relevance** over internal validity
- Perspectives must **genuinely disagree** on at least one substantive point — no hollow diversity
- Ground perspectives in real traditions, not caricatures
