---
interpretation: lens
---
**Mandate:** The agent **MUST** verify the delivery actually ran as planned and produced the operational artifacts the evaluate stage needs. Execution is the lens — sessions that "went fine" but left no attendance record, no observation log, and no deviation notes leave the evaluate stage blind to what actually happened.

## Check

The agent **MUST** verify, filing feedback for any violation:

1. The agent **MUST** verify that every planned session in the curriculum plan has a delivery-log entry — sessions that were skipped, cancelled, or rescheduled MUST be flagged with the reason and the remediation plan.
2. The agent **MUST** verify that the attendance record is at the individual level (who attended, who completed, who dropped) — aggregate counts only are insufficient for the evaluate stage to compute behavior-change cohorts.
3. The agent **MUST** verify that the facilitator captured in-session observations on engagement, points of confusion, and content the audience pushed back on — these are the raw material for the next iteration's improvements.
4. The agent **MUST** verify that any deviation from the curriculum plan (skipped section, swapped exercise, time overrun) is logged with the rationale; silent deviations are violations.
5. The agent **MUST** verify that logistics failures (room booking, technology, materials missing, access issues) are documented with the resolution so the next delivery doesn't repeat them.
6. The agent **MUST** verify that learner-generated artifacts the assessment plan calls for (worksheets, exercises, project submissions) are collected and stored where the evaluator can read them.
7. The agent **MUST** verify that any in-session feedback the learners gave (live polls, end-of-session reaction, raised concerns) is captured verbatim or near-verbatim, not summarized into "session went well".

## Common failure modes to look for

- A delivery log that records "session 1 — completed" with no attendance, no notes, no artifacts
- Attendance recorded as a headcount with no roster, making cohort analysis impossible
- "We adapted on the fly" with no statement of what was adapted or why
- A logistics issue mentioned in passing in a Slack thread that never made it into the formal log
- Learner reactions paraphrased into the facilitator's preferred reading ("overall positive")
- Worksheets handed back to learners and not collected, leaving the evaluator with no evidence of learning
