---
interpretation: lens
---
**Mandate:** The agent **MUST** verify the developed materials are facilitator-usable and learner-usable as built — not as imagined. Quality is the lens — materials that look complete in the doc but fail the moment a facilitator opens them or a learner needs them stall delivery and erode trust in the program.

## Check

The agent **MUST** verify, filing feedback for any violation:

1. The agent **MUST** verify that every module called for in the curriculum plan has its full material set present: facilitator guide, participant workbook (or async equivalent), exercises with answer keys, assessments with rubrics, and any required job aids.
2. The agent **MUST** verify that facilitator guides include the run-of-show timing, the talking points / questions to ask, transitions between activities, and contingency notes for common in-room failure modes — guides that read like content outlines are not facilitator-ready.
3. The agent **MUST** verify that exercises specify success criteria the facilitator can observe — "discuss in groups" without a stated outcome is not an exercise, it is a placeholder.
4. The agent **MUST** verify that accessibility requirements are met across the material set — alt text on every image carrying content, captions or transcripts on every video, sufficient color contrast in slides, keyboard-navigable interactive elements.
5. The agent **MUST** verify that terminology is consistent across the material set — a concept named one way in the slide deck and differently in the workbook is a quality violation.
6. The agent **MUST** verify that assessment items have correct answer keys with rationale, not just answer letters — facilitators need to coach incorrect answers, not just mark them.
7. The agent **MUST** verify that all third-party content (cases, videos, articles) carries clear permission / licensing status — content in materials with no permission line is a publication risk.

## Common failure modes to look for

- A facilitator guide that is the slide deck with notes copy-pasted into a Word doc, missing timings and transitions
- An exercise titled "Group discussion" with no prompt, no time-box, no success criterion
- Slides with images carrying meaningful content but no alt text
- An assessment whose "correct" answer rationale is just a restatement of the question
- A workbook that uses one term for a concept while the slides use a synonym for the same concept
- A video embedded with no transcript and no permission record
