3–6
Generative tone. Each director throws three to six ideas per turn — yes-and the wild ones first, prune later. Use this when you don't know the question yet.
Convene a private boardroom of named directors who disagree on purpose. Pose your hardest question, dial the temperature from brainstorm to debate, and watch six lenses stress-test your thinking — then walk out with a multi-lens analysis sharper than anything you'd write alone.
No cloud account. No data uploads. Conversations, analyses, and per-agent memories live on your disk; the directors run against your own provider keys.
Every hard decision you've sat with too long was missing the same thing — a counter-voice that wasn't going to flatter you. PrivateBoard isn't an AI assistant; it's six (and counting) named directors who push back, disagree, and sharpen your thinking from angles you wouldn't reach alone.
A skeptic challenges. A pattern-reader contextualizes. A first-principles thinker tears it apart. You hear all sides at once.
Solo reasoning has blind spots. A board surfaces them — by force of disagreement, not flattery.
Convene at 2am. Adjourn after 11 minutes. No coordination cost — just the thinking.
Voice mode replaces the chat scroll with a pixel-art boardroom · the directors take their seats around the table, the chair takes the host's chair. Each tone re-skins the floor and the palette — same gameworld, different mood. Drag to look around.
Each director carries a method, a long memory, and an opinion you can't talk them out of. We've spent months sharpening the standing six so the room feels like a real board — not seven instances of the same model agreeing in different fonts. When the room needs a perspective only you would hire, build it: bio, voice, model. They join the cast like everyone else.
Bring a perspective the standing six can't reach — your old boss, the imagined critic in your head, the discipline this room is missing.
No calendars, no quorum, no warm-up. The chair runs the room. You hold the floor.
Pose what's on your mind — a strategy, a decision, a theory. Pick the directors whose lenses you need most. Mix opposing styles for sharper rooms.
Dial the temperature from gentle brainstorm to systematic critique. Push back, redirect, or just listen as the directors take turns testing your thinking.
The room distills into a sharp, multi-perspective analysis: one-sentence thesis up top, each director's strongest argument attributed under it, the disagreements that didn't resolve kept intact. Forward it, file it, or use it to convene the next room.
Four rooms, one cast. Brainstorm to open the surface area, debate to test the obvious answer, critique to break what's already committed, research to chase what you don't yet know. The chair enforces the rhythm so the same six directors play four different games.
Generative tone. Each director throws three to six ideas per turn — yes-and the wild ones first, prune later. Use this when you don't know the question yet.
Six standing directors, six lenses each. Steelman before challenge — every claim survives a triangulation through philosophy, finance, design, history.
Severity × likelihood matrix surfaces what's load-bearing. Strength preservation per blocker — every objection ships with what to keep.
Claims demand evidence. Each director cross-references their assertions; the chair flags weak chains. Use this when the question hinges on facts you don't yet have.
Most "AI products" are a single model in a chat box. PrivateBoard is the engine that binds intelligence to identity — multi-model routing, durable memory, real skills. Each director runs on the model you assign, remembers what mattered, and reaches for tools when the question demands it.
Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, xAI, DeepSeek — wire any combination per agent. Pin opus to the skeptic, gpt-5 to the strategist, haiku to the chair. Bring your own keys; pay only the inference you actually use.
Per-director, per-room, durable across sessions. Pin facts you want every future room to see; let routine context decay. The chair carries what mattered into the final analysis.
Web search when the answer needs fresh data. URL fetch when you share a link. Per-agent skill grids — opt in only what each director should reach for. New skills shipping each release.
That startup thesis. That product bet. That contrarian view you're about to publish. Your board will find the structural flaws before the market does.
Should I leave? Should we pivot? Should I trust this person? Hard decisions need three good lenses, not one anxious internal monologue.
Working alone calcifies your blind spots. Convening forces articulation, exposes lazy assumptions, and rewards rigor with a written record.
No credit card. No onboarding ritual. Bring a question, pick a lineup, hit convene. Your multi-lens analysis is waiting on the other side.