## Geoeconomics Overlay

### Activation
Apply this overlay when `literature-mapper` is used for geoeconomics projects involving sanctions, economic statecraft, supply chains, financial networks, industrial policy, or strategic competition.

### Required Context
- Require the focal instrument, sender, target, market or network channel, strategic objective, and target venue family.
- Require adjacent literatures in international security, IPE, economics, finance, trade, and policy studies.
- Require whether the project studies coercion, deterrence, resilience, signaling, substitution, or network leverage.

### Subject-Specific Procedure
1. Organize literature by instrument and response channel, not only by policy topic.
2. Separate economic statecraft theory, sanctions effectiveness, supply chain exposure, financial network leverage, and market-response evidence.
3. Map each source by evidence type: theory, case evidence, causal design, network measurement, market evidence, or policy analysis.
4. Identify whether the project changes a scholarly debate or only updates a policy case.
5. Track rival explanations such as market cycles, compliance costs, domestic politics, or security shocks.

### Reviewer-Risk Checks
- Check whether the map overuses strategic competition language without statecraft evidence.
- Check whether sanctions, supply chain, and financial tools are grouped together without mechanism distinctions.
- Check whether policy commentary substitutes for peer-reviewed evidence.

### Output Requirements
- The literature map must include `Instrument`, `Sender`, `Target`, `Channel`, `Strategic Objective`, `Evidence Type`, and `Gap`.
- The output must distinguish geoeconomics, IPE, international security, and policy-practitioner conversations.
- Missing exposure, response, or network-measurement literature must be recorded as a search gap.

### Blocked Conditions
- Block contribution claims that rely only on recent policy salience.
- Block mechanism claims when the literature map cannot identify response-channel evidence.
- Do not treat broad geopolitical context as a substitute for economic instrument logic.
